EARLY SOVIET FAST REACTORS


The Soviet fast reactor program started in the early 1950s:

By the late 1950s, the fast reactor program changed to using sodium as the coolant:





FAST REACTOR DEVELOPMENT


As the Russian fast reactor program continued, reactor size increased rapidly:


Location Responsible Reactor Organization Status Purpose

BOR-60 Dimitrovgrad, Research Inst. Of Operating Experimental facility (1968) Russia Atomic Reactors for material BN-350 Aktau, Kazakh Atomic Energy Operation 135 MW (electric) and (1972) Kazakhstan Agency suspended 120,000 m³ fresh water from desalination, BN-600 Beloyarsk, MINATOM Operating 560 MW (electric) (1980) Russia BN-800 Beloyarsk & MINATOM 3 units under 800 MW (electric) (2000?) South Urals*, construction Russia * The South Urals project is part of a planned Nuclear Power Center at POMayak (Chelyabinsk), comprising a fuel fabrication plant, several BN-800 reactors and a reprocessing plant, (RT-1).





Shevchenko BN350: Situated on the shore of the Caspian Sea the plant generates 135 MW(e) and provides steam for an associated desalination plant.
(a) View of the interior of the reactor hall:

(b) View of the only nuclear-heated desalination unit in the world:





FAST REACTOR DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS


The Russian fast reactors have been designed to use plutonium:



       -  enriched UO2 is standard fuel
       -  only BOR-60 has ever run with substantial amounts of MOX fuel (tens kg Pu)
       -  tests have been performed with MOX in BN-350 (10 fuel assemblies) and BN-
          600 (8 fuel assemblies)

The core dimensions increased with power, and a change was made in the
plant layout:



          BOR-60       0.46 m in diameter     0.46 m high      Loop-type        
 
          BN-350       1.52 m                 1.07 m           Loop-type        
 
          BN-600       2.06 m                 0.76 m           Pool-type        
 
          BN-800       2.47 m                 0.97 m           Pool-type        
 




      
Pool-type                                  Loop-type
(BN-600/BN-800)                            (BN-350)
Reactor, piping, pumps and heat            Reactor located in separate vessel.
exchangers in sodium pool                  Piping connects vessel to heat exchanges
                                           and other components.




RUSSIAN PLANS FOR FAST REACTOR DEPLOYMENT


According to Minister Mikhailov (MINATOM), the Russian plans are as follows:


  1. "The Russian concept of plutonium management (both civil and weapons) is based on the postulate of the outer fuel cycle closure, necessity to enhance fuel efficiency, and decreasing radioactivity of disposed long-lived wastes."

  2. "In view of plutonium utilization of existing reactors being restricted, safe and reliable storage of separated civil plutonium at PO Mayak [Chelyabinsk] and ex- weapons plutonium is required."

  3. "Longer range plutonium disposition options are based on development of a Nuclear Power Center at PO Mayak (RT-1, Complex-300 and 3 BN-800s) to use accumulated civil and ex-weapons plutonium in fast reactors."

  4. "Long-term management options, which calls for fulfillment of research, envisage burning of excess plutonium and minor actinides in fast reactors with new core compositions."

  5. "Investigation is underway to estimate plutonium utilization options, possibly using foreign technology including those on light-water reactors and CANDU in the framework of defense nuclear centers concept."

  6. "International cooperation with the aim not only to develop the current technical policy but also to determine the optimum long-term disposition is required."




RATIONALE FOR THE RUSSIAN POLICY


The Russians have developed their fast reactor policy based on the following:


  1. Use of Russian inventories of plutonium for domestic electricity production in fast reactors frees up their inventories of enriched uranium for commercial export to generate hard currency.

  2. In Russia, the technology for MOX fueling of fast reactors is more advanced than is MOX fueling of thermal (light-water) reactors.

  3. Cost studies have shown that the new thermal reactor designs which meet revised safety requirements are more expensive than previous Soviet VVER designs and in fact are on a parity with the BN-800 design -- which also meets the revised safety standards, and

  4. MOX utilization in thermal reactors actually exacerbates the nuclear waste disposal issues (more long-lived radiotoxicity is generated), whereas MOX utilization in fast reactors mitigates these issues.