EARLY SOVIET FAST REACTORS
The Soviet fast reactor program started in the early 1950s:
- the first "reactor" was BR-1, a zero power experiment using plutonium metal for
fuel and mercury as the coolant
- in 1956, BR-1 was modified to produce 100 kW(thermal) and renamed BR-2
By the late 1950s, the fast reactor program changed to using sodium as the coolant:
- in 1958, BR-5 was operated at 5 MW(thermal) using plutonium oxide fuel
- changed to uranium carbide fuel in 1964
- in 1972, BR-5 was upgraded to 10 MW(thermal) with the fuel changed back to
plutonium oxide
FAST REACTOR DEVELOPMENT
As the Russian fast reactor program continued, reactor size increased rapidly:
Location Responsible
Reactor Organization Status Purpose
BOR-60 Dimitrovgrad, Research Inst. Of Operating Experimental facility
(1968) Russia Atomic Reactors for material
BN-350 Aktau, Kazakh Atomic Energy Operation 135 MW (electric) and
(1972) Kazakhstan Agency suspended 120,000 m³ fresh water
from desalination,
BN-600 Beloyarsk, MINATOM Operating 560 MW (electric)
(1980) Russia
BN-800 Beloyarsk & MINATOM 3 units under 800 MW (electric)
(2000?) South Urals*, construction
Russia
* The South Urals project is part of a planned Nuclear Power Center at POMayak
(Chelyabinsk), comprising a fuel fabrication plant, several BN-800 reactors and a
reprocessing plant, (RT-1).
Shevchenko BN350: Situated on the shore of the Caspian Sea the plant
generates 135 MW(e) and provides steam for an associated desalination plant.
(a) View of the interior of the reactor hall:
(b) View of the only nuclear-heated desalination unit in the world:
FAST REACTOR DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS
The Russian fast reactors have been designed to use plutonium:
UO2/PuO2 mixed-oxide (MOX) fuel is the reference fuel
- enriched UO2 is standard fuel
- only BOR-60 has ever run with substantial amounts of MOX fuel (tens kg Pu)
- tests have been performed with MOX in BN-350 (10 fuel assemblies) and BN-
600 (8 fuel assemblies)
The core dimensions increased with power, and a change was made in the
plant layout:
BOR-60 0.46 m in diameter 0.46 m high Loop-type
BN-350 1.52 m 1.07 m Loop-type
BN-600 2.06 m 0.76 m Pool-type
BN-800 2.47 m 0.97 m Pool-type
Pool-type Loop-type
(BN-600/BN-800) (BN-350)
Reactor, piping, pumps and heat Reactor located in separate vessel.
exchangers in sodium pool Piping connects vessel to heat exchanges
and other components.
RUSSIAN PLANS FOR FAST REACTOR DEPLOYMENT
According to Minister Mikhailov (MINATOM), the Russian plans are as follows:
- "The Russian concept of plutonium management (both civil and weapons) is based
on the postulate of the outer fuel cycle closure, necessity to enhance fuel
efficiency, and decreasing radioactivity of disposed long-lived wastes."
- "In view of plutonium utilization of existing reactors being restricted, safe and
reliable storage of separated civil plutonium at PO Mayak [Chelyabinsk] and ex-
weapons plutonium is required."
- "Longer range plutonium disposition options are based on development of a
Nuclear Power Center at PO Mayak (RT-1, Complex-300 and 3 BN-800s) to use
accumulated civil and ex-weapons plutonium in fast reactors."
- "Long-term management options, which calls for fulfillment of research, envisage
burning of excess plutonium and minor actinides in fast reactors with new core
compositions."
- "Investigation is underway to estimate plutonium utilization options, possibly using
foreign technology including those on light-water reactors and CANDU in the
framework of defense nuclear centers concept."
- "International cooperation with the aim not only to develop the current technical
policy but also to determine the optimum long-term disposition is required."
RATIONALE FOR THE RUSSIAN POLICY
The Russians have developed their fast reactor policy based on the following:
- Use of Russian inventories of plutonium for domestic electricity production in fast
reactors frees up their inventories of enriched uranium for commercial export to
generate hard currency.
- In Russia, the technology for MOX fueling of fast reactors is more advanced than
is MOX fueling of thermal (light-water) reactors.
- Cost studies have shown that the new thermal reactor designs which meet revised
safety requirements are more expensive than previous Soviet VVER designs and
in fact are on a parity with the BN-800 design -- which also meets the revised
safety standards, and
- MOX utilization in thermal reactors actually exacerbates the nuclear waste
disposal issues (more long-lived radiotoxicity is generated), whereas MOX
utilization in fast reactors mitigates these issues.