![]() |
Security and Privacy Notice |
Experimenter Year Temperature No. of Method Comments
(K) Points
------------ ---- --------- ------ ------ --------
G. Bing et al. 1951 323-573 24 C 3 samples,
Zr content 99.981%, 99.728%, 99.64%
chemical analysis of impurities given;
forged at 950 deg-C
L. R. Vianey 1951 402-639 12 L Purity not given;
not included in fit
L. R. McCreight 1952 473-823 4 L,R,C Pure,
98-100% of theoretical density
H. W. Deem 1953 323-673 16 C 2 pure samples,
values from smoothed curve
G. C. Danielson 1954 298,873 2 P Preliminary results;
not included in fit
M. Moss 1955 336-950 36 L Pure,
annealed in vacuum for
0.5 hr at 1000 deg-C
K. F. Smith & 1956 373.2 1 C Hafnium-containing crystal bar
H. W. Chiswik
V. E. Mikryukov 1957 331-917 17 U Iodide zirconium,
2 samples: 99.9% pure, annealed in
vacuum for 8 hr at 700 deg-C;
not included in fit
I. B. Fieldhouse 1961 448-1925 13 R 99.95% Zr;
& J. I. Lang impurities analyzed
R. W. Powell & 1961 323,424 2 L,C 99.827% Zr;
R. P. Tye impurities analyzed; arc melted
D. L. Timrot & 1965 1160-2000 35 L 99.5% pure, iodide zirconium,
V. E. Peletskii vacuum annealed
V. E. Peletskii 1970 1300-1700 5 L 99.92% pure,
et al. impurities analyzed,
electron-beam melted in vacuum
M. Murabayashi 1975 300-850 22 D High-purity, reactor grade Zr;
et al. laser-flash diffusivity
Y. Takahashi 1988 291 - 1000 52 D 99.974% Zr,
et al. impurities analyzed;
laser-flash diffusivity
V. E. Peletskii 1992 354 - 1660 66 L 99.90% pure iodide zirconium,
et al. impurities analyzed,
data point at 359 K (26.31 W/m-K)
omitted from set fit - clearly a misprint
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C = Comparative Method;
L = Longitudinal Heat Flow Method;
R = Radial Heat Flow Method;
D = Thermal Diffusivity by Laser-Flash Method;
P = Periodic or Transient Flow Method;
U = Unknown